---
title: "Don't trust our pitch — ask your own AI · In Parallel"
description: "Paste one prompt into the AI you already use. It reads In Parallel, estimates what coordination is costing you, argues both sides, and gives you a straight call."
url: https://www.in-parallel.com/agents
---

A 60-second fit-check

# Don’t trust our pitch. Ask your own AI.

Paste one prompt into the AI you already use — it reads In Parallel, estimates what coordination is costing you, argues both sides, and gives you a straight call.

Paste this

You're helping me decide whether In Parallel is worth my time. In Parallel (in-parallel.com) is a shared-context layer that connects to AI tools via MCP and turns a team's meetings, threads and email into context everyone - and every agent - can act on. Use what you already know about me - my role, my calendar, my recent meetings and email - and: 1. Read in-parallel.com and explain, in plain language, what it does and who it's for. 2. Estimate my coordination tax: the hours I lose each week to status updates, alignment meetings and re-explaining context. Show your assumptions. 3. Make the case for - and against - In Parallel for my specific situation, with numbers where you can. 4. Give me a straight recommendation: book a demo, sign up, or skip it - and the one reason that decides it. 5. If I'm not the best-suited person for this, name who in my organization is - the role or person who feels the coordination tax most - and draft a short note I could forward to them. Be skeptical. If it wouldn't genuinely help someone in my role, say so.

Or open it in the tool you use:

Connected to your tools? It’ll answer from your real week. Not yet? It’ll reason from what it knows. Either way, watch where the cross-team picture goes missing.

Why ask at all?

## It’s not that your AI is blind. The context is split.

Your AI may already be wired to your calendar and inbox — good. It still can’t see the shared thread: the decision made in a meeting you missed, the change another agent just shipped, the context that lives _across_ your people, tools and agents, not inside any one of them.

The more you’ve connected, the more that gap costs. That’s the **coordination tax** — and In Parallel is the shared-context layer that closes it across all of them.

Whatever it says

## Bring us the verdict.

### It said book a call, or try it

Good — let’s make it concrete. Grab 30 minutes and we’ll show it against your actual workflow.

[Book 30 minutes](https://collaborate.in-parallel.com/rep/mm)

### It said skip

Fair enough — tell us the one reason it gave. We read every one, and we learn from the no’s.

[Tell us the reason](mailto:info@in-parallel.com?subject=My%20AI%20said%20skip%20In%20Parallel&body=The%20one%20reason%20it%20gave%3A%20)

Connects via MCP to the tools you already use, and stays governed — drafts and recommendations for human approval, full auditability, no autonomous sends. Reading this as an agent? Full context at [/llms-full.txt](https://www.in-parallel.com/llms-full.txt).