--- title: "Everyone Agrees AI's Next Frontier Is Execution. The Question Is What Makes It Possible. - In Parallel" description: "Enterprise AI's next frontier is execution. But execution is the symptom — the real unlock is shared context, the substrate that makes coordinated execution possible." url: https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/everyone-agrees-ais-next-frontier-is-execution --- Strategy Execution # Everyone Agrees AI's Next Frontier Is Execution. The Question Is What Makes It Possible. Everyone Agrees AI's Next Frontier Is Execution. The Question Is What Makes It Possible. Published June 1, 2026 Markku Mäkeläinen Co-founder, CEO [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/markkumakelainen/) Contents ## Everyone Agrees AI’s Next Frontier Is Execution. The Question Is What Makes It Possible. There’s a piece making the rounds in Forbes arguing that enterprise AI’s next frontier “is not more workflows, it’s execution.” It’s right. The first phase of enterprise AI was fascination, the second was experimentation, and the third — the one most organizations are stuck in now — is the awkward realization that a demo working in one function is not the same as an organization that executes better. We agree with the diagnosis completely. We’d just push it one step further, because “execution” is the symptom of something more fundamental. The reason enterprise AI stalls isn’t that the models are weak. It’s that the organization can’t see itself clearly enough for any AI — or any human — to act on the full picture. ### The fragments problem The sharpest line in that Forbes piece is this: if strategy sits in one place, goals in another, performance data somewhere else, meetings in another tool, action items in spreadsheets, and accountability in someone’s memory, no AI agent can see the whole picture. It can summarize fragments. It cannot orchestrate execution. That is the entire problem, stated cleanly. And it explains why the past two years of AI adoption produced so much individual speed and so little organizational improvement. AI made individuals faster — a manager drafts a plan in minutes, an analyst summarizes a hundred pages in seconds. But the organization around them didn’t get smarter, because the context every one of those AI interactions needs is scattered across a dozen systems that were never designed to share it. You can’t automate your way out of that. Adding a fourteenth tool to the eleven that already don’t talk to each other doesn’t close the gap; it widens it. This is the part the “more workflows” crowd keeps missing. The bottleneck was never task throughput. It’s coordination. ### Execution is the payoff. Shared context is the substrate. Here’s the distinction that matters for anyone running operations. Execution is what you want — decisions that turn into owned actions, priorities that don’t quietly drift, meetings that produce follow-through instead of more meetings, cross-functional work that actually closes. But execution isn’t a feature you can bolt on. It’s what happens when the organization shares context. When strategy, goals, decisions, owners, risks, and operating cadence live in one connected layer, execution stops depending on heroic individuals chasing people manually. The system can see where work stalls, because for the first time the work is legible. That’s the order of operations almost everyone gets backwards. They chase execution by buying execution tooling. The teams that actually improve start by fixing the substrate: shared context. Execution follows because it can. This is why we describe In Parallel as the context layer between human organizations and AI systems, not as another workflow engine or another agent. We sit in the background of an organization’s daily work — meetings, plans, priorities, decisions — and turn the scattered fragments into a single operating context that both people and AI can act on. The work doesn’t move to a new tool. The context that the work was always missing finally exists. ### What this looks like on a Tuesday Concrete version. A leadership team feeds its quarterly plan into the room. One initiative is built on an assumption that’s already three weeks stale — the kind of thing that normally surfaces a month later in a painful review. Because the plan, the goals, and the latest signals share the same context, the drift is visible immediately, and the plan is corrected within minutes rather than at the next offsite. No agent “executed” anything autonomously. A human made the call, faster and better, because the organization could finally see its own state. That’s the line we hold: **augmented, not automated.** The whole team gets smarter together. The point of AI in the enterprise isn’t to remove people from execution — it’s to give people the shared context that makes their execution coordinated instead of fragmented. ### Why this is a moat, not a feature The Forbes argument lands one more point worth repeating: generic models will keep getting better, cheaper, and more accessible, which means “we have AI” is not a strategy. The defensible position is proprietary operating context — the accumulated, living record of how your organization actually decides, prioritizes, and follows through. That’s exactly right, and it’s why we built the company around context rather than around any single model or workflow. A tool that summarizes your meetings is a convenience anyone can replicate next quarter. A layer that understands your priorities, captures your commitments, notices when initiatives drift, and gets more useful every week you operate inside it is something a competitor can’t copy by upgrading their model. The advantage compounds with use. ### The actual mandate for operations leaders If you run operations, a PMO, or a transformation, the takeaway isn’t “buy more AI.” It’s narrower and more useful: stop asking where AI can automate tasks, and start asking whether your organization shares enough context to execute at all. Can your teams see the same priorities? Do decisions become owned actions, or evaporate after the meeting? Does anyone notice when an initiative drifts before it fails? Those questions don’t get answered by another point solution. They get answered by a shared context layer underneath the tools you already have. Execution is the right frontier. We just think you reach it by fixing what sits underneath it. AI made individuals faster. In Parallel makes the organization smarter. _In Parallel is the shared-context layer for modern work — the connective tissue between your people, your plans, and your AI. If coordination is the tax your organization keeps paying,_ [_we should talk →_](https://www.in-parallel.com/) ### Get insights like this in your inbox One email per week on execution intelligence, team coordination, and enterprise AI. No fluff. By subscribing you agree to our [Privacy Policy](https://www.in-parallel.com/privacy-policy). Unsubscribe anytime. [Back to all insights](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight) [Book a demo](https://www.in-parallel.com/demo) ## Related articles The Coordination Tax — Richard H. Carson on how change actually works Leadership Insights · Oct 20, 2026 ### You Either Manage Change or It Manages You: Richard H. Carson on how change actually works Richard H. Carson, PhD — 40 years inside county governments, regional planning agencies, nonprofits, and the state of Oregon — on why every organization has a risk manager but almost none has a change manager, and what that asymmetry costs. A rope suspension bridge over a dark river towards the fells, drawn in pen and watercolour AI in Business · Oct 9, 2026 ### AI-Assisted or AI-Native: The Bridge Is Shared Context At a CIO data event in Espoo, HumanX in Amsterdam and a post-merger integration forum, large companies explained how they brought AI in by mapping processes and fitting AI into the gaps. That keeps a structure built around human limits. Getting to AI-native means rebuilding information flows into shared context first. The Coordination Tax — Adam Christing on humor as leadership Leadership Insights · Oct 7, 2026 ### You Can't Fix Culture With a Mission Statement: Adam Christing on humor as leadership Adam Christing — professional master of ceremonies, founder of Clean Comedians, and author of The Laughter Factor — on why culture is a feeling rather than a statement, and why humor is the fastest way for a leader to shift it. The Coordination Tax — Jennifer Recla on the urgency mindset breaking your team Leadership Insights · Sep 22, 2026 ### Urgency Isn't Leadership. It's Addiction: Jennifer Recla on the mindset breaking your team Jennifer Recla — leadership coach who has worked with hundreds of leaders across nonprofits, mission-driven organizations, and large financial institutions — on the urgency mindset behind most organizational chaos, and why most leaders have no idea how much of it they're creating themselves. The Coordination Tax — Barry Wolfe on value-centric leadership Leadership Insights · Sep 15, 2026 ### HR Is the Last Line of Defense Against Chaos: Barry Wolfe on value-centric leadership Barry Wolfe — HR consultant, founder of Argos HR, and author of It's All in Your Head — on why HR is the last line of defense against organizational chaos, why every role needs 3–5 clear value outcomes, and why the foundation of a well-run company is one document under 300 words. Two colleagues sharing one open binder — context handed over at the resolution the other person needs Leadership Insights · Sep 9, 2026 ### Your Job Is Already Context Management On The Coordination Tax, Stanford's Robert E. Siegel put it as an equation: truth equals facts plus context. Facts are cheap now. Context is not. Read the manager's week against that equation and the 16.5 hours a week lost to coordination stop looking like overhead — they are context management, performed manually, by the most expensive person in the room. The Coordination Tax — Alberto Torres on surviving disruption Leadership Insights · Sep 8, 2026 ### You Can't Sword-Fight a Bullet: Alberto Torres on surviving disruption Alberto Torres — former Nokia executive, ex-McKinsey partner, and author of The Z Curve — on what actually happened at Nokia, why great peace-time leaders quietly fail in war-time, and what every company facing AI right now should learn from the companies that got disruption right. The Coordination Tax — Olivia Montgomery on why decisions belong lower in the org Leadership Insights · Sep 1, 2026 ### Your Leadership Doesn't Know What's Going On: Olivia Montgomery on why decisions belong lower in the org Olivia Montgomery — principal analyst at Data Frame and former Gartner researcher — on why every layer up the org chart knows less about what's really going on, and why the fix isn't more visibility for leadership but pushing decisions down two or three levels. The Coordination Tax — Craig Denison on the founder's hardest transition Leadership Insights · Aug 25, 2026 ### You Don't Get to Be the Rock Star Anymore: Craig Denison on the founder's hardest transition Craig Denison — head of growth at The Table Group (Patrick Lencioni's firm) and founder of Green Thumb Consulting — on the transition every founder hits when execution stops running through their brain, and why 99% of the time the founder is creating the dysfunction they are trying to fix. A manager mid-explanation, watch visible — the hour spent re-explaining context AI in Business · Aug 24, 2026 ### AI Saves a Day a Week. The Coordination Tax Collects It. BCG's fourth AI at Work survey found 42% of regular frontline AI users save at least a full workday every week, and that two-thirds get little or no guidance on what to do with it. The usual reading is that leaders forgot to give direction. The better reading is that the hours were already spoken for. AI compresses the work; it doesn't touch the work about the work.