--- title: "The Half-Life of a Decision - In Parallel" description: "The further a decision travels from the meeting where it was made, the less of its original meaning survives. Here's what decision decay costs — and what actually prevents it." url: https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/the-half-life-of-a-decision --- Strategy Execution # The Half-Life of a Decision The Half-Life of a Decision Published July 13, 2026 Kristian Luoma Co-founder, CPO kristian@in-parallel.com [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/kluoma/) Contents ## The Half-Life of a Decision A decision is made in a meeting. Clear, specific, owned. Three people were in the room. They all understood it the same way. By the time it reaches the ten people who need to act on it, two communication steps later, it has transformed. The nuance is gone. The context that made it make sense has been stripped away. Some people heard a version that included the caveats. Some heard a version that didn’t. Two people are acting on interpretations that point in different directions. McKinsey research shows that 80% of organisations struggle with decision-making — and the traditional RACI model often makes it worse. The problem isn’t that people can’t make decisions. It’s that decisions decay in transit. ### What Decision Decay Actually Is Every time a decision passes through a human being — gets summarised, paraphrased, forwarded, mentioned in passing — it loses something. The original context degrades. The specific reasoning gets compressed into a conclusion. The caveats and conditions get dropped because they’re hard to convey quickly. This is the half-life of a decision: the rate at which shared understanding of what was decided degrades as it travels through an organisation. The half-life varies by organisation. In a ten-person startup where everyone is in the same room, it might be measured in days. In a 500-person company with five layers of management and decisions communicated through a chain of weekly syncs, it can be measured in hours. By the time the decision reaches the people who need to act on it, it may bear only a passing resemblance to what was actually decided. McKinsey’s research supports this: even high-performing companies deliver around 30% less value than their strategies promise — and the primary culprit is not strategy quality but information fidelity. The decision degrades. The execution follows the degraded version. The strategy delivers the degraded result. ### The Four Stages of Decay **Stage one: the decision is made.** It’s specific, contextualised, and understood by everyone in the room. This is peak fidelity. **Stage two: the decision is summarised.** Someone writes it up. The summary is accurate but compressed. Some context is already lost. This happens within hours. **Stage three: the decision is communicated.** Someone reads the summary and passes it on — in a Slack message, in a conversation, in a mention during a standup. More context is dropped. The nuance is gone. What remains is the conclusion, stripped of the reasoning that made it right. **Stage four: the decision is acted upon.** By this point, different people have heard different versions. Some have the context. Some don’t. Some are acting on what they think was decided, which may or may not match what was actually decided. Execution diverges. The gap between what was decided and what gets executed is not, in most cases, a failure of competence or commitment. It’s a failure of fidelity. The decision decayed in transit. ### Why Shorter Distance Is the Fix The conventional response to decision decay is better communication. Clearer summaries. More explicit documentation. Town halls where leaders re-explain the decision to everyone who needs to act on it. These interventions help at the margins. They don’t solve the structural problem. The structural problem is distance. Every step between the decision and the system where work happens is a step where meaning can be lost. The solution isn’t better compression at each step — it’s fewer steps. When a decision made in a meeting flows directly into the plan — captured structurally, in context, connected to the work it affects — the distance between decision and action collapses. The person who needs to act doesn’t receive a summarised version of a paraphrased version of what was decided. They receive the decision itself, with the context intact. A [Living Plan](https://www.in-parallel.com/pages) that updates from meetings doesn’t just keep the plan current. It maintains decision fidelity. What was decided is what gets acted upon. The decay stops at the source. ### The Leadership Implication Decision decay has a specific implication for leaders that’s worth naming directly. The decisions you think you’ve made may not be the decisions your organisation is acting on. The gap between intent and action is not, in most cases, a motivation problem. It’s a fidelity problem. The decision travelled through too many steps, lost too much context, and arrived somewhere different from where you sent it. The fix isn’t louder communication. It’s shorter distance — infrastructure that carries the decision from the meeting where it was made to the systems where it needs to land, without the lossy compression of human relay chains. That’s not a management philosophy. It’s an engineering problem. And it has an engineering solution. _In Parallel captures decisions at the source and propagates them directly to your execution systems — no decay in transit._ [_See how it works →_](https://www.in-parallel.com/) **Related reading** - [The Accountability Gap: Why Commitments Made in Meetings Don’t Become Results](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/the-accountability-gap) - [The Knowability Problem](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/the-knowability-problem) - [11,175 Channels Down to 435. Now What?](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/11175-channels-down-to-435-now-what) ### Get insights like this in your inbox One email per week on execution intelligence, team coordination, and enterprise AI. No fluff. By subscribing you agree to our [Privacy Policy](https://www.in-parallel.com/privacy-policy). Unsubscribe anytime. [Back to all insights](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight) [Book a demo](https://www.in-parallel.com/demo) ## Related articles The Coordination Tax — Richard H. Carson on how change actually works Leadership Insights · Oct 20, 2026 ### You Either Manage Change or It Manages You: Richard H. Carson on how change actually works Richard H. Carson, PhD — 40 years inside county governments, regional planning agencies, nonprofits, and the state of Oregon — on why every organization has a risk manager but almost none has a change manager, and what that asymmetry costs. A rope suspension bridge over a dark river towards the fells, drawn in pen and watercolour AI in Business · Oct 9, 2026 ### AI-Assisted or AI-Native: The Bridge Is Shared Context At a CIO data event in Espoo, HumanX in Amsterdam and a post-merger integration forum, large companies explained how they brought AI in by mapping processes and fitting AI into the gaps. That keeps a structure built around human limits. Getting to AI-native means rebuilding information flows into shared context first. The Coordination Tax — Adam Christing on humor as leadership Leadership Insights · Oct 7, 2026 ### You Can't Fix Culture With a Mission Statement: Adam Christing on humor as leadership Adam Christing — professional master of ceremonies, founder of Clean Comedians, and author of The Laughter Factor — on why culture is a feeling rather than a statement, and why humor is the fastest way for a leader to shift it. The Coordination Tax — Jennifer Recla on the urgency mindset breaking your team Leadership Insights · Sep 22, 2026 ### Urgency Isn't Leadership. It's Addiction: Jennifer Recla on the mindset breaking your team Jennifer Recla — leadership coach who has worked with hundreds of leaders across nonprofits, mission-driven organizations, and large financial institutions — on the urgency mindset behind most organizational chaos, and why most leaders have no idea how much of it they're creating themselves. The Coordination Tax — Barry Wolfe on value-centric leadership Leadership Insights · Sep 15, 2026 ### HR Is the Last Line of Defense Against Chaos: Barry Wolfe on value-centric leadership Barry Wolfe — HR consultant, founder of Argos HR, and author of It's All in Your Head — on why HR is the last line of defense against organizational chaos, why every role needs 3–5 clear value outcomes, and why the foundation of a well-run company is one document under 300 words. Two colleagues sharing one open binder — context handed over at the resolution the other person needs Leadership Insights · Sep 9, 2026 ### Your Job Is Already Context Management On The Coordination Tax, Stanford's Robert E. Siegel put it as an equation: truth equals facts plus context. Facts are cheap now. Context is not. Read the manager's week against that equation and the 16.5 hours a week lost to coordination stop looking like overhead — they are context management, performed manually, by the most expensive person in the room. The Coordination Tax — Alberto Torres on surviving disruption Leadership Insights · Sep 8, 2026 ### You Can't Sword-Fight a Bullet: Alberto Torres on surviving disruption Alberto Torres — former Nokia executive, ex-McKinsey partner, and author of The Z Curve — on what actually happened at Nokia, why great peace-time leaders quietly fail in war-time, and what every company facing AI right now should learn from the companies that got disruption right. The Coordination Tax — Olivia Montgomery on why decisions belong lower in the org Leadership Insights · Sep 1, 2026 ### Your Leadership Doesn't Know What's Going On: Olivia Montgomery on why decisions belong lower in the org Olivia Montgomery — principal analyst at Data Frame and former Gartner researcher — on why every layer up the org chart knows less about what's really going on, and why the fix isn't more visibility for leadership but pushing decisions down two or three levels. The Coordination Tax — Craig Denison on the founder's hardest transition Leadership Insights · Aug 25, 2026 ### You Don't Get to Be the Rock Star Anymore: Craig Denison on the founder's hardest transition Craig Denison — head of growth at The Table Group (Patrick Lencioni's firm) and founder of Green Thumb Consulting — on the transition every founder hits when execution stops running through their brain, and why 99% of the time the founder is creating the dysfunction they are trying to fix. A manager mid-explanation, watch visible — the hour spent re-explaining context AI in Business · Aug 24, 2026 ### AI Saves a Day a Week. The Coordination Tax Collects It. BCG's fourth AI at Work survey found 42% of regular frontline AI users save at least a full workday every week, and that two-thirds get little or no guidance on what to do with it. The usual reading is that leaders forgot to give direction. The better reading is that the hours were already spoken for. AI compresses the work; it doesn't touch the work about the work.