--- title: "What a Good Chief of Staff Actually Does — And Why Most Can't Do It - In Parallel" description: "The Chief of Staff role is one of the most misunderstood in modern organisations. At its best, it maintains executive situational awareness. In practice, it collapses into coordination overhead." url: https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/what-a-good-chief-of-staff-actually-does --- Strategy Execution # What a Good Chief of Staff Actually Does — And Why Most Can't Do It what-a-good-chief-of-staff-actually-does What a Good Chief of Staff Actually Does — And Why Most Can't Do It Published July 27, 2026 Kristian Luoma Co-founder, CPO kristian@in-parallel.com [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/kluoma/) Contents ## What a Good Chief of Staff Actually Does — And Why Most Can’t Do It The Chief of Staff role has grown significantly in recent years. Once confined to government and the military, it has spread across technology companies, scale-ups, and large enterprises. Deloitte has two active research projects studying it. The Chief of Staff Association now has members in more than 50 countries. And yet, for most organisations, the role is deeply misunderstood — not in theory, but in practice. The theory is compelling. The practice collapses almost immediately into something much narrower. McKinsey research reveals that 56% of Chiefs of Staff work over 50 hours a week, with 25% exceeding 60 hours. They’re not working those hours on strategy. They’re working them on coordination. ### What the Role Is Supposed to Do At its best, the Chief of Staff function exists to solve a specific problem: as an organisation grows, the executive at the top loses situational awareness. They’re in too many meetings, managing too many relationships, making too many decisions with incomplete context. They can no longer maintain a current picture of what’s happening across the organisation — what was decided, what’s at risk, what needs their attention. The Chief of Staff is the person who maintains that picture. They attend the meetings the executive can’t attend, track the decisions that are being made, monitor the commitments that are at risk, and synthesise everything into the briefing the executive needs to make good decisions. They are the executive’s situational awareness infrastructure. This is genuinely valuable work. When it’s done well, the executive makes better decisions faster, catches problems earlier, and allocates their attention to the things that actually require it. ### What the Role Actually Becomes The LSE Business Review notes that Chiefs of Staff who succeed do so by acting as relational gatekeepers — building alliances, maintaining context across functions, and bridging the gap between the executive’s priorities and the organisation’s reality. In practice, most Chiefs of Staff spend the majority of their time on three things: calendar management, slide production, and coordination overhead. Not because they’re not capable of more. Because the organisation has no other infrastructure for these tasks, and someone has to do them. This is the structural trap. The executive needs situational awareness. The CoS is the only person positioned to provide it. But situational awareness — understanding what’s actually happening across a complex organisation — requires an enormous amount of manual work. You have to attend the meetings. Chase the updates. Read the notes. Synthesise the signals. And do it continuously, not just before the quarterly review. In organisations with ten active workstreams, that’s a full-time job by itself. Add calendar management and stakeholder communications and it becomes more than a full-time job. The strategic work — the deep synthesis, the pattern recognition, the proactive identification of risks — gets squeezed out by the operational urgency of keeping the machine running. ### The Infrastructure Gap Underneath the Role The reason the Chief of Staff role so often collapses into coordination overhead is not a talent problem. It’s an infrastructure problem. Most organisations don’t maintain a current, structured record of what’s happening. Decisions live in meeting notes. Commitments live in Slack threads. Risks live in conversations. The CoS has to manually reconstruct the state of the organisation from these fragments — continuously, across multiple workstreams, in parallel. That reconstruction is what consumes the hours. And it’s work that, fundamentally, doesn’t require human intelligence. It requires human presence — being in the right rooms, reading the right documents, stitching together the right signals. That’s exactly the kind of work that should be automated. When a [coordination layer](https://www.in-parallel.com/our-vision) exists — a system that captures decisions from every meeting, maintains a current execution state, and surfaces risks proactively — the Chief of Staff’s job changes fundamentally. The reconstruction work disappears. What remains is the judgment work: the synthesis, the pattern recognition, the hard conversations that require human intelligence and organisational trust. This is the Chief of Staff role as it was intended. Not a highly educated coordinator, but a strategic partner who operates from accurate, current information — because the infrastructure maintains that information automatically. ### What This Means for Organisations Hiring a CoS The decision to hire a Chief of Staff often reflects a real and growing problem: the executive has lost situational awareness and the organisation is suffering for it. Decisions are slower, risks are caught later, and the organisation is harder to steer. Hiring a CoS addresses the symptom. Building the infrastructure addresses the cause. A good Chief of Staff, with the right infrastructure under them, can focus entirely on the judgment work that only a human can do. Without that infrastructure, even the best CoS will spend most of their time on reconstruction work that a machine should handle. The organisations getting the most from the Chief of Staff role are the ones that have built the coordination layer first — and then given their CoS the space to do the work that actually requires them. _In Parallel provides the coordination infrastructure that lets Chiefs of Staff focus on strategy, not reconstruction._ [_See how it works →_](https://www.in-parallel.com/) **Related reading** - [The Missing Middle: Dorsey Nailed the Diagnosis. Now What?](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/the-missing-middle) - [The Briefing Nobody Writes](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/the-briefing-nobody-writes) - [Why Program Visibility Breaks: The Meeting Paradox Behind Execution Drift](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight/why-program-visibility-breaks) ### Get insights like this in your inbox One email per week on execution intelligence, team coordination, and enterprise AI. No fluff. By subscribing you agree to our [Privacy Policy](https://www.in-parallel.com/privacy-policy). Unsubscribe anytime. [Back to all insights](https://www.in-parallel.com/insight) [Book a demo](https://www.in-parallel.com/demo) ## Related articles The Coordination Tax — Richard H. Carson on how change actually works Leadership Insights · Oct 20, 2026 ### You Either Manage Change or It Manages You: Richard H. Carson on how change actually works Richard H. Carson, PhD — 40 years inside county governments, regional planning agencies, nonprofits, and the state of Oregon — on why every organization has a risk manager but almost none has a change manager, and what that asymmetry costs. A rope suspension bridge over a dark river towards the fells, drawn in pen and watercolour AI in Business · Oct 9, 2026 ### AI-Assisted or AI-Native: The Bridge Is Shared Context At a CIO data event in Espoo, HumanX in Amsterdam and a post-merger integration forum, large companies explained how they brought AI in by mapping processes and fitting AI into the gaps. That keeps a structure built around human limits. Getting to AI-native means rebuilding information flows into shared context first. The Coordination Tax — Adam Christing on humor as leadership Leadership Insights · Oct 7, 2026 ### You Can't Fix Culture With a Mission Statement: Adam Christing on humor as leadership Adam Christing — professional master of ceremonies, founder of Clean Comedians, and author of The Laughter Factor — on why culture is a feeling rather than a statement, and why humor is the fastest way for a leader to shift it. The Coordination Tax — Jennifer Recla on the urgency mindset breaking your team Leadership Insights · Sep 22, 2026 ### Urgency Isn't Leadership. It's Addiction: Jennifer Recla on the mindset breaking your team Jennifer Recla — leadership coach who has worked with hundreds of leaders across nonprofits, mission-driven organizations, and large financial institutions — on the urgency mindset behind most organizational chaos, and why most leaders have no idea how much of it they're creating themselves. The Coordination Tax — Barry Wolfe on value-centric leadership Leadership Insights · Sep 15, 2026 ### HR Is the Last Line of Defense Against Chaos: Barry Wolfe on value-centric leadership Barry Wolfe — HR consultant, founder of Argos HR, and author of It's All in Your Head — on why HR is the last line of defense against organizational chaos, why every role needs 3–5 clear value outcomes, and why the foundation of a well-run company is one document under 300 words. Two colleagues sharing one open binder — context handed over at the resolution the other person needs Leadership Insights · Sep 9, 2026 ### Your Job Is Already Context Management On The Coordination Tax, Stanford's Robert E. Siegel put it as an equation: truth equals facts plus context. Facts are cheap now. Context is not. Read the manager's week against that equation and the 16.5 hours a week lost to coordination stop looking like overhead — they are context management, performed manually, by the most expensive person in the room. The Coordination Tax — Alberto Torres on surviving disruption Leadership Insights · Sep 8, 2026 ### You Can't Sword-Fight a Bullet: Alberto Torres on surviving disruption Alberto Torres — former Nokia executive, ex-McKinsey partner, and author of The Z Curve — on what actually happened at Nokia, why great peace-time leaders quietly fail in war-time, and what every company facing AI right now should learn from the companies that got disruption right. The Coordination Tax — Olivia Montgomery on why decisions belong lower in the org Leadership Insights · Sep 1, 2026 ### Your Leadership Doesn't Know What's Going On: Olivia Montgomery on why decisions belong lower in the org Olivia Montgomery — principal analyst at Data Frame and former Gartner researcher — on why every layer up the org chart knows less about what's really going on, and why the fix isn't more visibility for leadership but pushing decisions down two or three levels. The Coordination Tax — Craig Denison on the founder's hardest transition Leadership Insights · Aug 25, 2026 ### You Don't Get to Be the Rock Star Anymore: Craig Denison on the founder's hardest transition Craig Denison — head of growth at The Table Group (Patrick Lencioni's firm) and founder of Green Thumb Consulting — on the transition every founder hits when execution stops running through their brain, and why 99% of the time the founder is creating the dysfunction they are trying to fix. A manager mid-explanation, watch visible — the hour spent re-explaining context AI in Business · Aug 24, 2026 ### AI Saves a Day a Week. The Coordination Tax Collects It. BCG's fourth AI at Work survey found 42% of regular frontline AI users save at least a full workday every week, and that two-thirds get little or no guidance on what to do with it. The usual reading is that leaders forgot to give direction. The better reading is that the hours were already spoken for. AI compresses the work; it doesn't touch the work about the work.